<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Blogging Conflict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/</link>
	<description>Anthony Baggett Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:34:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>Although it seems that a subscriber would be less likely to comment, you&#039;re probably right. The more I think about it, I haven&#039;t seen many blogs which are extremely active in comments - that display a low subscriber count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it seems that a subscriber would be less likely to comment, you&#8217;re probably right. The more I think about it, I haven&#8217;t seen many blogs which are extremely active in comments &#8211; that display a low subscriber count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting question.

They&#039;re both important but for different reasons. I think one fuels the other though and that&#039;s the beauty ... no need to choose, they&#039;ll both grow naturally and at their own pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting question.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re both important but for different reasons. I think one fuels the other though and that&#8217;s the beauty &#8230; no need to choose, they&#8217;ll both grow naturally and at their own pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Hey Jonathan,

After writing this, I noticed you sort of touched on it in your latest post:

&quot;If you’re reading through RSS, what makes you wanna click on the link and visit the blog to comment?&quot;

Those are some good questions you ask, and I plan to comment after a little more thought on it. As far as comments, you never have a shortage of them. I guess that&#039;s the power of networking and social media paying off......and excellent content as well, of course. I&#039;m looking forward to your ebook on conversational blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jonathan,</p>
<p>After writing this, I noticed you sort of touched on it in your latest post:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you’re reading through RSS, what makes you wanna click on the link and visit the blog to comment?&#8221;</p>
<p>Those are some good questions you ask, and I plan to comment after a little more thought on it. As far as comments, you never have a shortage of them. I guess that&#8217;s the power of networking and social media paying off&#8230;&#8230;and excellent content as well, of course. I&#8217;m looking forward to your ebook on conversational blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan-C. Phillips</title>
		<link>http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan-C. Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antbag.com/the-great-blogging-conflict/#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Good question Anthony, I would say I prefer getting many comments, but on the other hand having a lot of RSS Subscribers means potentially more comments, although I know some blog that have 2000+ rss subscribers and barely recieve any comments. As you know I believe in conversations, to me, that&#039;s what&#039;s important, getting people to join in the fun and share their views, opinions and thoughts. more rss subscribers is always nice though, if the 250 subscribers I have were commenting on everything I post I would love it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Anthony, I would say I prefer getting many comments, but on the other hand having a lot of RSS Subscribers means potentially more comments, although I know some blog that have 2000+ rss subscribers and barely recieve any comments. As you know I believe in conversations, to me, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s important, getting people to join in the fun and share their views, opinions and thoughts. more rss subscribers is always nice though, if the 250 subscribers I have were commenting on everything I post I would love it <img src='http://antbag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
